cargo/core/resolver/
errors.rs

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
use std::fmt;
use std::task::Poll;

use crate::core::{Dependency, PackageId, Registry, Summary};
use crate::sources::source::QueryKind;
use crate::util::edit_distance::edit_distance;
use crate::util::{GlobalContext, OptVersionReq, VersionExt};
use anyhow::Error;

use super::context::ResolverContext;
use super::types::{ConflictMap, ConflictReason};

/// Error during resolution providing a path of `PackageId`s.
pub struct ResolveError {
    cause: Error,
    package_path: Vec<PackageId>,
}

impl ResolveError {
    pub fn new<E: Into<Error>>(cause: E, package_path: Vec<PackageId>) -> Self {
        Self {
            cause: cause.into(),
            package_path,
        }
    }

    /// Returns a path of packages from the package whose requirements could not be resolved up to
    /// the root.
    pub fn package_path(&self) -> &[PackageId] {
        &self.package_path
    }
}

impl std::error::Error for ResolveError {
    fn source(&self) -> Option<&(dyn std::error::Error + 'static)> {
        self.cause.source()
    }
}

impl fmt::Debug for ResolveError {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
        self.cause.fmt(f)
    }
}

impl fmt::Display for ResolveError {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
        self.cause.fmt(f)
    }
}

pub type ActivateResult<T> = Result<T, ActivateError>;

#[derive(Debug)]
pub enum ActivateError {
    Fatal(anyhow::Error),
    Conflict(PackageId, ConflictReason),
}

impl From<::anyhow::Error> for ActivateError {
    fn from(t: ::anyhow::Error) -> Self {
        ActivateError::Fatal(t)
    }
}

impl From<(PackageId, ConflictReason)> for ActivateError {
    fn from(t: (PackageId, ConflictReason)) -> Self {
        ActivateError::Conflict(t.0, t.1)
    }
}

pub(super) fn activation_error(
    resolver_ctx: &ResolverContext,
    registry: &mut dyn Registry,
    parent: &Summary,
    dep: &Dependency,
    conflicting_activations: &ConflictMap,
    candidates: &[Summary],
    gctx: Option<&GlobalContext>,
) -> ResolveError {
    let to_resolve_err = |err| {
        ResolveError::new(
            err,
            resolver_ctx
                .parents
                .path_to_bottom(&parent.package_id())
                .into_iter()
                .map(|(node, _)| node)
                .cloned()
                .collect(),
        )
    };

    if !candidates.is_empty() {
        let mut msg = format!("failed to select a version for `{}`.", dep.package_name());
        msg.push_str("\n    ... required by ");
        msg.push_str(&describe_path_in_context(
            resolver_ctx,
            &parent.package_id(),
        ));

        msg.push_str("\nversions that meet the requirements `");
        msg.push_str(&dep.version_req().to_string());
        msg.push_str("` ");

        if let Some(v) = dep.version_req().locked_version() {
            msg.push_str("(locked to ");
            msg.push_str(&v.to_string());
            msg.push_str(") ");
        }

        msg.push_str("are: ");
        msg.push_str(
            &candidates
                .iter()
                .map(|v| v.version())
                .map(|v| v.to_string())
                .collect::<Vec<_>>()
                .join(", "),
        );

        let mut conflicting_activations: Vec<_> = conflicting_activations.iter().collect();
        conflicting_activations.sort_unstable();
        // This is reversed to show the newest versions first. I don't know if there is
        // a strong reason to do this, but that is how the code previously worked
        // (see https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/5037) and I don't feel like changing it.
        conflicting_activations.reverse();
        // Flag used for grouping all semver errors together.
        let mut has_semver = false;

        for (p, r) in &conflicting_activations {
            match r {
                ConflictReason::Semver => {
                    has_semver = true;
                }
                ConflictReason::Links(link) => {
                    msg.push_str("\n\nthe package `");
                    msg.push_str(&*dep.package_name());
                    msg.push_str("` links to the native library `");
                    msg.push_str(link);
                    msg.push_str("`, but it conflicts with a previous package which links to `");
                    msg.push_str(link);
                    msg.push_str("` as well:\n");
                    msg.push_str(&describe_path_in_context(resolver_ctx, p));
                    msg.push_str("\nOnly one package in the dependency graph may specify the same links value. This helps ensure that only one copy of a native library is linked in the final binary. ");
                    msg.push_str("Try to adjust your dependencies so that only one package uses the `links = \"");
                    msg.push_str(link);
                    msg.push_str("\"` value. For more information, see https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/resolver.html#links.");
                }
                ConflictReason::MissingFeatures(features) => {
                    msg.push_str("\n\nthe package `");
                    msg.push_str(&*p.name());
                    msg.push_str("` depends on `");
                    msg.push_str(&*dep.package_name());
                    msg.push_str("`, with features: `");
                    msg.push_str(features);
                    msg.push_str("` but `");
                    msg.push_str(&*dep.package_name());
                    msg.push_str("` does not have these features.\n");
                    // p == parent so the full path is redundant.
                }
                ConflictReason::RequiredDependencyAsFeature(features) => {
                    msg.push_str("\n\nthe package `");
                    msg.push_str(&*p.name());
                    msg.push_str("` depends on `");
                    msg.push_str(&*dep.package_name());
                    msg.push_str("`, with features: `");
                    msg.push_str(features);
                    msg.push_str("` but `");
                    msg.push_str(&*dep.package_name());
                    msg.push_str("` does not have these features.\n");
                    msg.push_str(
                        " It has a required dependency with that name, \
                         but only optional dependencies can be used as features.\n",
                    );
                    // p == parent so the full path is redundant.
                }
                ConflictReason::NonImplicitDependencyAsFeature(features) => {
                    msg.push_str("\n\nthe package `");
                    msg.push_str(&*p.name());
                    msg.push_str("` depends on `");
                    msg.push_str(&*dep.package_name());
                    msg.push_str("`, with features: `");
                    msg.push_str(features);
                    msg.push_str("` but `");
                    msg.push_str(&*dep.package_name());
                    msg.push_str("` does not have these features.\n");
                    msg.push_str(
                        " It has an optional dependency with that name, \
                         but that dependency uses the \"dep:\" \
                         syntax in the features table, so it does not have an \
                         implicit feature with that name.\n",
                    );
                    // p == parent so the full path is redundant.
                }
            }
        }

        if has_semver {
            // Group these errors together.
            msg.push_str("\n\nall possible versions conflict with previously selected packages.");
            for (p, r) in &conflicting_activations {
                if let ConflictReason::Semver = r {
                    msg.push_str("\n\n  previously selected ");
                    msg.push_str(&describe_path_in_context(resolver_ctx, p));
                }
            }
        }

        msg.push_str("\n\nfailed to select a version for `");
        msg.push_str(&*dep.package_name());
        msg.push_str("` which could resolve this conflict");

        return to_resolve_err(anyhow::format_err!("{}", msg));
    }

    // We didn't actually find any candidates, so we need to
    // give an error message that nothing was found.
    //
    // Maybe the user mistyped the ver_req? Like `dep="2"` when `dep="0.2"`
    // was meant. So we re-query the registry with `dep="*"` so we can
    // list a few versions that were actually found.
    let mut new_dep = dep.clone();
    new_dep.set_version_req(OptVersionReq::Any);

    let candidates = loop {
        match registry.query_vec(&new_dep, QueryKind::Exact) {
            Poll::Ready(Ok(candidates)) => break candidates,
            Poll::Ready(Err(e)) => return to_resolve_err(e),
            Poll::Pending => match registry.block_until_ready() {
                Ok(()) => continue,
                Err(e) => return to_resolve_err(e),
            },
        }
    };

    let mut candidates: Vec<_> = candidates.into_iter().map(|s| s.into_summary()).collect();

    candidates.sort_unstable_by(|a, b| b.version().cmp(a.version()));

    let mut msg = if !candidates.is_empty() {
        let versions = {
            let mut versions = candidates
                .iter()
                .take(3)
                .map(|cand| cand.version().to_string())
                .collect::<Vec<_>>();

            if candidates.len() > 3 {
                versions.push("...".into());
            }

            versions.join(", ")
        };

        let locked_version = dep
            .version_req()
            .locked_version()
            .map(|v| format!(" (locked to {})", v))
            .unwrap_or_default();

        let mut msg = format!(
            "failed to select a version for the requirement `{} = \"{}\"`{}\n\
             candidate versions found which didn't match: {}\n\
             location searched: {}\n",
            dep.package_name(),
            dep.version_req(),
            locked_version,
            versions,
            registry.describe_source(dep.source_id()),
        );
        msg.push_str("required by ");
        msg.push_str(&describe_path_in_context(
            resolver_ctx,
            &parent.package_id(),
        ));

        // If we have a pre-release candidate, then that may be what our user is looking for
        if let Some(pre) = candidates.iter().find(|c| c.version().is_prerelease()) {
            msg.push_str("\nif you are looking for the prerelease package it needs to be specified explicitly");
            msg.push_str(&format!(
                "\n    {} = {{ version = \"{}\" }}",
                pre.name(),
                pre.version()
            ));
        }

        // If we have a path dependency with a locked version, then this may
        // indicate that we updated a sub-package and forgot to run `cargo
        // update`. In this case try to print a helpful error!
        if dep.source_id().is_path() && dep.version_req().is_locked() {
            msg.push_str(
                "\nconsider running `cargo update` to update \
                          a path dependency's locked version",
            );
        }

        if registry.is_replaced(dep.source_id()) {
            msg.push_str("\nperhaps a crate was updated and forgotten to be re-vendored?");
        }

        msg
    } else {
        // Maybe the user mistyped the name? Like `dep-thing` when `Dep_Thing`
        // was meant. So we try asking the registry for a `fuzzy` search for suggestions.
        let candidates = loop {
            match registry.query_vec(&new_dep, QueryKind::Alternatives) {
                Poll::Ready(Ok(candidates)) => break candidates,
                Poll::Ready(Err(e)) => return to_resolve_err(e),
                Poll::Pending => match registry.block_until_ready() {
                    Ok(()) => continue,
                    Err(e) => return to_resolve_err(e),
                },
            }
        };

        let mut candidates: Vec<_> = candidates.into_iter().map(|s| s.into_summary()).collect();

        candidates.sort_unstable_by_key(|a| a.name());
        candidates.dedup_by(|a, b| a.name() == b.name());
        let mut candidates: Vec<_> = candidates
            .iter()
            .filter_map(|n| Some((edit_distance(&*new_dep.package_name(), &*n.name(), 3)?, n)))
            .collect();
        candidates.sort_by_key(|o| o.0);
        let mut msg: String;
        if candidates.is_empty() {
            msg = format!("no matching package named `{}` found\n", dep.package_name());
        } else {
            msg = format!(
                "no matching package found\nsearched package name: `{}`\n",
                dep.package_name()
            );
            let mut names = candidates
                .iter()
                .take(3)
                .map(|c| c.1.name().as_str())
                .collect::<Vec<_>>();

            if candidates.len() > 3 {
                names.push("...");
            }
            // Vertically align first suggestion with missing crate name
            // so a typo jumps out at you.
            msg.push_str("perhaps you meant:      ");
            msg.push_str(&names.iter().enumerate().fold(
                String::default(),
                |acc, (i, el)| match i {
                    0 => acc + el,
                    i if names.len() - 1 == i && candidates.len() <= 3 => acc + " or " + el,
                    _ => acc + ", " + el,
                },
            ));
            msg.push('\n');
        }
        msg.push_str(&format!("location searched: {}\n", dep.source_id()));
        msg.push_str("required by ");
        msg.push_str(&describe_path_in_context(
            resolver_ctx,
            &parent.package_id(),
        ));

        msg
    };

    if let Some(gctx) = gctx {
        if gctx.offline() {
            msg.push_str(
                "\nAs a reminder, you're using offline mode (--offline) \
                 which can sometimes cause surprising resolution failures, \
                 if this error is too confusing you may wish to retry \
                 without the offline flag.",
            );
        }
    }

    to_resolve_err(anyhow::format_err!("{}", msg))
}

/// Returns String representation of dependency chain for a particular `pkgid`
/// within given context.
pub(super) fn describe_path_in_context(cx: &ResolverContext, id: &PackageId) -> String {
    let iter = cx
        .parents
        .path_to_bottom(id)
        .into_iter()
        .map(|(p, d)| (p, d.and_then(|d| d.iter().next())));
    describe_path(iter)
}

/// Returns String representation of dependency chain for a particular `pkgid`.
///
/// Note that all elements of `path` iterator should have `Some` dependency
/// except the first one. It would look like:
///
/// (pkg0, None)
/// -> (pkg1, dep from pkg1 satisfied by pkg0)
/// -> (pkg2, dep from pkg2 satisfied by pkg1)
/// -> ...
pub(crate) fn describe_path<'a>(
    mut path: impl Iterator<Item = (&'a PackageId, Option<&'a Dependency>)>,
) -> String {
    use std::fmt::Write;

    if let Some(p) = path.next() {
        let mut dep_path_desc = format!("package `{}`", p.0);
        for (pkg, dep) in path {
            let dep = dep.unwrap();
            let source_kind = if dep.source_id().is_path() {
                "path "
            } else if dep.source_id().is_git() {
                "git "
            } else {
                ""
            };
            let requirement = if source_kind.is_empty() {
                format!("{} = \"{}\"", dep.name_in_toml(), dep.version_req())
            } else {
                dep.name_in_toml().to_string()
            };
            let locked_version = dep
                .version_req()
                .locked_version()
                .map(|v| format!("(locked to {}) ", v))
                .unwrap_or_default();

            write!(
                dep_path_desc,
                "\n    ... which satisfies {}dependency `{}` {}of package `{}`",
                source_kind, requirement, locked_version, pkg
            )
            .unwrap();
        }

        return dep_path_desc;
    }

    String::new()
}